LEE COUNTY – The Edison State College President ignoring your questions for a 7th day in a row.. remaining silent about big payout's and huge salaries.
But one of his bosses is talking saying the state's top boss the governor should get involved.
The Board of Trustees is supposed to oversee what's going on at Edison but tonight one of those board members says spending is more out of control than he first thought and that's why he wants the Governor to get involved.
David Klien says, "I am mad as hell".
That's how Edison Board member David Klien responded after I emailed him this letter -- obtained by Fox Four written on behalf of the faculty at Edison State College -- strong allegations of abuse of power -- extravagant salaries and payout's -- even discrimination in its hiring process.
David Klien says, "I am not saying there is anything criminal going on but it is certainly distasteful I'll put it that way.
Klien is talking about James Browder's more than 100 thousand dollar raise, a 300 thousand dollar contract buy out for Noreen Thomas who had only been on the job for three months and President Ken Walker's contract worth more than a half million bucks.
David Klien adds, "I thought that Dr. Walker was highly paid but it's even more than I thought I have never seen those numbers".
But why not? He is a board member who oversees the operations of Edison State College.
David Klien says, "you are supposed to keep your trustees advised -- we were never told why -- basically we have the fiduciary responsibility and we don't know anything".
Klien says the very reputation of the college and years and years of work are at stake. We're also learning there are new allegations that students are getting degrees that they haven't earned.
David Klien added, "if it was just a matter of salaries and people quitting it would be one thing, this I hear about degrees being ground out then you start to worry".
Klien is so worried -- he thinks the state must get involved quickly.
David Klien says, "I would invite the Governor of the State of Florida to look into this -- he can send anybody he wants but I think at this point the people of South West Florida deserve that they need to know exactly what's going on".
And Thursday afternoon we may get some of those answers. President Walker will meet with the faculty to address these concerns and he has invited the media to attend. We will be there -- working to get your questions answered.
CREDIT: Fox 4 on Your Side with Edison State College Mess!
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Teacher mutiny at Edison State College?
FORT MYERS, Fla. - Is there a faculty mutiny taking place at Edison State College?
A new memo obtained by Fox 4 shows that might be the case and it's prompting an immediate reaction from the administration.
For seven days, Fox 4 has requested interviews with the college's president Dr. Kenneth Walker and the school's spokesperson Catherine Bergerson. For a week we've been told they were too busy to answer your questions face-to-face.
Now it seems, the school's faculty is fed up.
In a two-page stinging rebuke of the college's top officials, the faculty wrote up a statement calling recent pay hikes a "grave concern."
A top concern: How Vice President of Operations Dr. James Browder could get a $100,000 raise after just two months on the job.
"We were not informed of this directly," the faculty wrote. "And there was no semblance of a normal attempt to include faculty in the decision."
In fact, one board member told us he wasn't notified either after the college quietly moved Browder into a higher paying job, one held by then Executive Vice President Dr. Noreen Thomas, who was given a secret $300,000 buy out to leave and told to keep quiet.
"The situation reflects poorly on the college," the faculty wrote. "Since it gives the impression that Dr. Browder was...silently given the powers and salary commensurate with a position for which he has no credentials and little experience."
But the critique doesn't stop there.
In this rising revolt, faculty are also going after the school's president, Dr. Kenneth Walker, saying he's being paid a lot more than we thought - they quote $860,000 plus a yearly bonus.
"Dr. Walker, who prides himself upon 'Servant Leadership' has a total compensation package that exceeds that of most presidents of major universities," the faculty wrote. "Where is the fiscal oversight?"
Other concerns: That a large number of diplomas were given out to students who didn't meet graduation requirements.
And allegations the college isn't hiring enough minorities.
Fox 4 wanted to ask professors about this letter and their concerns but was told they are not allowed to talk to the media. We were told all questions have to be referred to the very school spokesperson who won't do an on camera interview.
But that could all change Thursday. The faculty will be meeting one-on-one with Dr. Walker and we will be there.
Read the full letter below:
District Statement of Faculty Concern
We, the District Faculty of Edison State College, have crafted this statement to express our grave concern with recent developments and revelations about our fine institution. The following is a list of concerns, both in terms of substance and impact on the image of the college, which we would like to have addressed at a district wide video-conference meeting between the District President of the College and the Faculty Senate on Monday, March 28th at 4 PM in Room S-117 on Lee Campus.
1) With all due respect to his professional achievements Dr. James Browder was hired at the college in September of 2010 to be the Vice President of Operations. At the same time we experienced the sudden departure of then Executive Vice President Dr. Noreen Thomas without an adequate explanation. Then the President of Lee Campus, Dr. James Martin, who was hired over the course of a year-long process, also left suddenly after only a semester on the job. Again, this took place suddenly and without adequate explanation. Most recently, we have witnessed the sudden departure of the Vice President of Academic Affairs, Dr. Steve Atkins. Dr. Atkins was the leader of our on-going SACS re-accreditation initiative and the campus visit is this year. Furthermore, his letter of resignation clearly stated that he felt he could no longer work with current upper administration and do his job effectively. The attrition in the Administration is most troubling by itself, but it is made worse by all that is on the line for us as an institution this year. In addition, many of us have since discovered in the news that Dr. Browder has been assigned control of many other vital areas of the college beyond Operations. We were not informed of this directly, and there was no semblance of a normal attempt to include faculty in the decision. Crucially this expansion of power includes Student Services, Academics, and Accreditation. Despite his long-professional record, it is not clear what there is in it that would justify his becoming the Executive Vice President and, more specifically, the de facto chief Academic officer of a higher education institution. At the very least, the situation reflects poorly on the college since it gives the impression that Dr. Browder was originally appointed to a post for which he was arguably qualified, and then silently given the powers and salary commensurate with a position for which he has no credentials and little experience after three other top administrators mysteriously and suddenly departed. Both the pattern and the current situation are major concerns.
2) The above considerations are exacerbated by the fact that a large number of graduates were granted degrees even though it was known that they did not qualify for graduation this past fall and in prior semesters. While the direct decisions were made at the level of the Associate Dean and a number of individuals throughout the institution are aware of the situation, Dr. Browder must have approved the most recent round of inappropriate substitutions of general education and program core classes that led to the faulty graduations in light of his expanded position. The integrity of our Edison State College degrees is of vital importance to our mission. The correct course of action that should be considered is a self-reporting of these violations and a plan for remediation and correction of the problem.
3) In addition to the above concerns, recent public revelations indicate that our current long-serving District President, Dr. Kenneth Walker, has an annual total compensation package of at least $860,000 with yearly bonuses of 25% of that. Preliminary analysis of the total compensation in his contract suggests he may actually be the most highly paid college President in the nation. For comparison, the President of Miami-Dade, an institution with six or seven times the number of students we have, makes hundreds of thousands of dollars less. In fact, Dr. Walker who prides himself upon "Servant Leadership" has a total compensation package that exceeds that of most Presidents of major universities, including FSU, UF, Auburn, Berkeley, and many others. In fact, so far our research has not found a higher total compensation package anywhere in public education. In the context of recent state budget cuts to higher education and our current standing near the bottom of advisor to student ratios, low pay for staff assistants, and so on, this pay seems incommensurate with the financial picture that has been painted for us by upper Administration. This impression is made worse by recent revelations about the salary increase received by Dr. Browder, even though such increases may be claimed as justified by the above referenced increase in his duties. His total compensation as Executive Vice President is more than many college Presidents nationally. Another approach to the issue can be seen in the Edison budget documents from 2007-2008, the top five individuals at the college accounted for over $2,000,000 in compensations as of three years ago. Yet, in the 2010-2011 budget documents, no actual salaries for these posts are listed at all, and it would appear that formal requests by the press are required for us to see the full extent of the current situation. There is a concern that any numbers we discover through this process may again seem grossly out of line with the idea that we are all sharing the pain of doing more with less at Edison. It is important to note that the District Board of Trustees has oversight on such matters and it leads one to ask some difficult questions, "Where is the fiscal oversight?" and "How do Board Members explain and justify such total compensation packages when so many areas of the college that directly impact students are in need?"
4) Over the last several years members of the faculty have worked very hard to put into place the bold visions of our District President. Many of us have worked longer hours, taught more students, and taken on expanded roles in terms of college service. While we are, on the whole, positive about our receipt of a raise in the recent academic year, we feel it is a just reward for this work. More specifically, we have worked hard to ensure that our on-going SACS re-accreditation process be as successful as possible by instituting a rigorous self-evaluation portfolio process, adding new avenues of Professional Development opportunities, and helping to coordinate assessment at the levels of our courses, programs, and divisions. Yet, with the departure of Dr. Atkins there is a serious concern that our SACS visit may result in the discovery of key institutional deficiencies. While we do not hope for this, we do want there to be a proper accounting for the sources of any deficiencies that emerge with the recognition that faculty have done their part.
5) Lastly, there remain a number of other issues that threaten to sully what has been until recently a terrific and growing reputation for Edison State College. Here we will deal specifically with recent allegations of unfair hiring practices in combinations with very low minority representation in the Administration. We take diversity very seriously as a goal at our institution and have recently sought to expand protections. Yet, we have heard nothing about the nature of a thorough investigation from our own Human Resources Department into these allegations.
It is our position that these issues should be specifically addressed in a frank and open manner by the leader of Edison State College so that the faculty may feel confident in the direction of our institution. With all due respect for a long tradition of progress at Edison, this statement made on behalf of the District Faculty Senate constitutes a request that a satisfactory accounting of these specifics be forthcoming at the above mentioned meeting.
CREDIT: Fox 4 Exposes Teacher Mutiny at Edison State College?
A new memo obtained by Fox 4 shows that might be the case and it's prompting an immediate reaction from the administration.
For seven days, Fox 4 has requested interviews with the college's president Dr. Kenneth Walker and the school's spokesperson Catherine Bergerson. For a week we've been told they were too busy to answer your questions face-to-face.
Now it seems, the school's faculty is fed up.
In a two-page stinging rebuke of the college's top officials, the faculty wrote up a statement calling recent pay hikes a "grave concern."
A top concern: How Vice President of Operations Dr. James Browder could get a $100,000 raise after just two months on the job.
"We were not informed of this directly," the faculty wrote. "And there was no semblance of a normal attempt to include faculty in the decision."
In fact, one board member told us he wasn't notified either after the college quietly moved Browder into a higher paying job, one held by then Executive Vice President Dr. Noreen Thomas, who was given a secret $300,000 buy out to leave and told to keep quiet.
"The situation reflects poorly on the college," the faculty wrote. "Since it gives the impression that Dr. Browder was...silently given the powers and salary commensurate with a position for which he has no credentials and little experience."
But the critique doesn't stop there.
In this rising revolt, faculty are also going after the school's president, Dr. Kenneth Walker, saying he's being paid a lot more than we thought - they quote $860,000 plus a yearly bonus.
"Dr. Walker, who prides himself upon 'Servant Leadership' has a total compensation package that exceeds that of most presidents of major universities," the faculty wrote. "Where is the fiscal oversight?"
Other concerns: That a large number of diplomas were given out to students who didn't meet graduation requirements.
And allegations the college isn't hiring enough minorities.
Fox 4 wanted to ask professors about this letter and their concerns but was told they are not allowed to talk to the media. We were told all questions have to be referred to the very school spokesperson who won't do an on camera interview.
But that could all change Thursday. The faculty will be meeting one-on-one with Dr. Walker and we will be there.
Read the full letter below:
District Statement of Faculty Concern
We, the District Faculty of Edison State College, have crafted this statement to express our grave concern with recent developments and revelations about our fine institution. The following is a list of concerns, both in terms of substance and impact on the image of the college, which we would like to have addressed at a district wide video-conference meeting between the District President of the College and the Faculty Senate on Monday, March 28th at 4 PM in Room S-117 on Lee Campus.
1) With all due respect to his professional achievements Dr. James Browder was hired at the college in September of 2010 to be the Vice President of Operations. At the same time we experienced the sudden departure of then Executive Vice President Dr. Noreen Thomas without an adequate explanation. Then the President of Lee Campus, Dr. James Martin, who was hired over the course of a year-long process, also left suddenly after only a semester on the job. Again, this took place suddenly and without adequate explanation. Most recently, we have witnessed the sudden departure of the Vice President of Academic Affairs, Dr. Steve Atkins. Dr. Atkins was the leader of our on-going SACS re-accreditation initiative and the campus visit is this year. Furthermore, his letter of resignation clearly stated that he felt he could no longer work with current upper administration and do his job effectively. The attrition in the Administration is most troubling by itself, but it is made worse by all that is on the line for us as an institution this year. In addition, many of us have since discovered in the news that Dr. Browder has been assigned control of many other vital areas of the college beyond Operations. We were not informed of this directly, and there was no semblance of a normal attempt to include faculty in the decision. Crucially this expansion of power includes Student Services, Academics, and Accreditation. Despite his long-professional record, it is not clear what there is in it that would justify his becoming the Executive Vice President and, more specifically, the de facto chief Academic officer of a higher education institution. At the very least, the situation reflects poorly on the college since it gives the impression that Dr. Browder was originally appointed to a post for which he was arguably qualified, and then silently given the powers and salary commensurate with a position for which he has no credentials and little experience after three other top administrators mysteriously and suddenly departed. Both the pattern and the current situation are major concerns.
2) The above considerations are exacerbated by the fact that a large number of graduates were granted degrees even though it was known that they did not qualify for graduation this past fall and in prior semesters. While the direct decisions were made at the level of the Associate Dean and a number of individuals throughout the institution are aware of the situation, Dr. Browder must have approved the most recent round of inappropriate substitutions of general education and program core classes that led to the faulty graduations in light of his expanded position. The integrity of our Edison State College degrees is of vital importance to our mission. The correct course of action that should be considered is a self-reporting of these violations and a plan for remediation and correction of the problem.
3) In addition to the above concerns, recent public revelations indicate that our current long-serving District President, Dr. Kenneth Walker, has an annual total compensation package of at least $860,000 with yearly bonuses of 25% of that. Preliminary analysis of the total compensation in his contract suggests he may actually be the most highly paid college President in the nation. For comparison, the President of Miami-Dade, an institution with six or seven times the number of students we have, makes hundreds of thousands of dollars less. In fact, Dr. Walker who prides himself upon "Servant Leadership" has a total compensation package that exceeds that of most Presidents of major universities, including FSU, UF, Auburn, Berkeley, and many others. In fact, so far our research has not found a higher total compensation package anywhere in public education. In the context of recent state budget cuts to higher education and our current standing near the bottom of advisor to student ratios, low pay for staff assistants, and so on, this pay seems incommensurate with the financial picture that has been painted for us by upper Administration. This impression is made worse by recent revelations about the salary increase received by Dr. Browder, even though such increases may be claimed as justified by the above referenced increase in his duties. His total compensation as Executive Vice President is more than many college Presidents nationally. Another approach to the issue can be seen in the Edison budget documents from 2007-2008, the top five individuals at the college accounted for over $2,000,000 in compensations as of three years ago. Yet, in the 2010-2011 budget documents, no actual salaries for these posts are listed at all, and it would appear that formal requests by the press are required for us to see the full extent of the current situation. There is a concern that any numbers we discover through this process may again seem grossly out of line with the idea that we are all sharing the pain of doing more with less at Edison. It is important to note that the District Board of Trustees has oversight on such matters and it leads one to ask some difficult questions, "Where is the fiscal oversight?" and "How do Board Members explain and justify such total compensation packages when so many areas of the college that directly impact students are in need?"
4) Over the last several years members of the faculty have worked very hard to put into place the bold visions of our District President. Many of us have worked longer hours, taught more students, and taken on expanded roles in terms of college service. While we are, on the whole, positive about our receipt of a raise in the recent academic year, we feel it is a just reward for this work. More specifically, we have worked hard to ensure that our on-going SACS re-accreditation process be as successful as possible by instituting a rigorous self-evaluation portfolio process, adding new avenues of Professional Development opportunities, and helping to coordinate assessment at the levels of our courses, programs, and divisions. Yet, with the departure of Dr. Atkins there is a serious concern that our SACS visit may result in the discovery of key institutional deficiencies. While we do not hope for this, we do want there to be a proper accounting for the sources of any deficiencies that emerge with the recognition that faculty have done their part.
5) Lastly, there remain a number of other issues that threaten to sully what has been until recently a terrific and growing reputation for Edison State College. Here we will deal specifically with recent allegations of unfair hiring practices in combinations with very low minority representation in the Administration. We take diversity very seriously as a goal at our institution and have recently sought to expand protections. Yet, we have heard nothing about the nature of a thorough investigation from our own Human Resources Department into these allegations.
It is our position that these issues should be specifically addressed in a frank and open manner by the leader of Edison State College so that the faculty may feel confident in the direction of our institution. With all due respect for a long tradition of progress at Edison, this statement made on behalf of the District Faculty Senate constitutes a request that a satisfactory accounting of these specifics be forthcoming at the above mentioned meeting.
CREDIT: Fox 4 Exposes Teacher Mutiny at Edison State College?
Labels:
all education matters,
colleges,
edison state college,
education,
faculty,
loans,
students,
teachers
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
White House Insider: Michelle Obama Blowout?
NewsFlavor
Tags: Barack Obama, election, government, Michelle Obama, Politics, President Obama, White House Insider
Our White House Insider sends us this email detailing an explosive confrontation between First Lady Michelle Obama and members of White House Staff.
Author’s Note: This email came to us yesterday afternoon. As of publication, our White House Insider has been unable to confirm the specific details of this report. This account is based solely upon information they received from one or more staff currently within the White House. Here is that email in its entirety with the exception of personal information regarding the Insider that was withheld.
___
Sorry for delay in getting back to you. -personal information not included- Situation very fluid RE elections, WH, Obama
, etc. Received something you may find interesting RE First Lady. M.O. has become increasingly aggressive w/staff at WH. Recent blowout took place involving First Lady
screaming (exact word used) at staff member. Said something to effect – “You are either with us or against us. One or the other.” Also heard to say that “the country doesn’t deserve us” to more than one member of WH. Apparently M.O. convinced Emmanuel has staff leaking information to him or fears that. Not sure what she fears from R.E. specifically but working to find out. Believes he may be dealing directly with Clintons? VJs role has increased dramatically in recent weeks even more than it already was. Axelrod diminished. Also told Gibbs very much out of favor with M.O. may be gone soon. Developing.
West Wing is increasingly in bunker mentality these days. President remains unresponsive/agitated while at W.H. ,repeats that he “wants to be out speaking to the people.” Staff paranoia at all time high. Fear of H.C. described as “palpable”. President DID offer VP spot to her. CONFIRMED AGAIN. Have more specifics on that developing but not ready to share yet. Will say it appears H.C. considering VP offer. B.C. wants her to run for Pres. in ‘12 though. Developing.
Will have more in coming days. -personal information not included- Talk in person then.
REFERENCE: WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: CLINTONS GOING FOR IT
http://newsflavor.com/opinions/white-house-insider-the-clintons-are-going-for-it/
Read more: http://newsflavor.com/opinions/white-house-insider-michelle-obama-blowout/#ixzz12oG3qI5M
http://newsflavor.com/opinions/white-house-insider-the-clintons-are-going-for-it/
Read more: http://newsflavor.com/opinions/white-house-insider-michelle-obama-blowout/#ixzz12oG3qI5M
Labels:
chaos,
disarray,
intrigue,
obama,
white house
AP-mtvU Poll: College Students' Obamamania Wanes
by Associated Press/AP Online
October 14, 2010
WASHINGTON – The Obamamania that gripped college campuses two years ago is gone.
An Associated Press-mtvU poll found college students cooling in their support for President Barack Obama, a fresh sign of trouble for Democrats struggling to rekindle enthusiasm among many of these newest voters for the crucial midterm elections in three weeks.
Forty-four percent of students approve of the job Obama is doing as president, while 27 percent are unhappy with his stewardship, according to the survey conducted late last month. That’s a significant drop from the 60 percent who gave the president high marks in a May 2009 poll. Only 15 percent had a negative opinion back then.
It’s not just students. Obama’s support from many groups has ebbed since his early months in office because of persistently high unemployment and opposition to his plans to revive the economy and overhaul the health care system. But his diminished backing from college students raises further questions about whether the
Democrats’ efforts to rally them – and other loyal supporters such as blacks and union members – will be enough to prevent Republicans from winning control of Congress in the Nov. 2 elections.
Obama’s weaker performance on campus also underscores his party’s struggles to turn the 15 million first-time voters of 2008 – nearly one in eight of that year’s total – into a solid political army. Exit polls from 2008 show 55 percent of new voters were age 18 to 24, and those young first-timers strongly backed
Obama and Democratic House candidates – a potent bloc if Democrats could lure them back to the voting booth.
Hoping to rekindle campus enthusiasm, Obama planned to appear Thursday at a youth town hall being shown live on MTV, BET and other networks. He also is to lead a rally Sunday at Ohio State University, and in recent days he headlined a massive gathering at the University of Wisconsin and a webcast town hall at George Washington University.
Ohio State’s 55,000 students are a big part of a central Ohio congressional district in which Democratic Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy is facing a rematch with her 2008 opponent, Republican Steve Stivers. Kilroy spokesman Brad Bauman says the students are “a huge voting bloc for us,” but Stivers spokesman John Damschroder says any advantage Kilroy had on campus in the close 2008 race will be minimized.
“She had a wind at her back last time,” he said, referring to students’ support then for Obama. “Now it’s a stand-alone election for her.”
Political scientists, campaign workers, students and others say many students are unhappy with Obama’s handling of the economy, wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and failures to end the ban against gays serving openly in the military or to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. There’s also frustration with the messy political process and his inability to deliver on his campaign promise to change Washington.
“People expect things to happen quickly,” said Elizabeth Wright, a senior at the University of Colorado. “I don’t think people understand it takes time.”
The findings in the AP-mtvU poll, which surveyed more than 2,000 undergraduates age 18 to 24, come as students and others say political activity on campuses is way down from the frenetic levels of the 2008 presidential race. Josh Rohrer, a senior at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Va., says it was impossible to walk to class two years ago without seeing campaign fliers, T-shirts and tables strewn with candidates’ brochures.
“Now, if you don’t read a newspaper, you wouldn’t know there’s about to be an election,” he said.
Even so, college Republicans and Democrats are still registering students and helping them vote with absentee ballots if needed. Republicans aired a TV ad in college towns in Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida called “The Breakup,” showing young people expressing disillusionment with Obama. Democrats say they’ve made nearly 2 million phone calls and visits to young voters since late May.
Enthusiasm by all groups dips in midterm elections compared to presidential races. The drop-off is compounded for college students, who can be distracted by everything from classes to football and often aren’t registered to vote in their school’s congressional district.
“It sort of falls under the radar,” said Rebecca Leber, a senior from the University of Rochester.
In the AP-mtvU poll, white students are about evenly divided over Obama – 34 percent approve of his performance while 37 percent disapprove. In May 2009, they approved by 53 percent to 21 percent. The drop is consistent with his decreased popularity among all whites.
Minority students are positive by 58 percent to 13 percent margin, slightly worse than in May 2009. In both polls, about a quarter overall were neutral.
Heather Smith, president of Rock the Vote, a nonpartisan group that encourages young people to vote, said it has registered 225,000 young voters for this year’s election, more than four times as many as in the last midterm in 2006. But she says the political parties aren’t spending enough to energize students, and she predicted turnout would resemble 2006, a mediocre year.“It’s a cycle of neglect,” she said.
To combat that, entertainer Jay-Z has made a TV ad for HeadCount, a group of musicians and others who register young people to vote, in which he says, “Fight for what you believe in.”
AP-GfK polls show Obama remains more popular among younger than older voters, but more older people express interest in the congressional elections. A September survey by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center found that among people under 30, those favoring Republicans are likelier than Democratic supporters to say they’ve thought a lot about the election.
The AP-mtvU Poll was conducted Sept. 20-24 by Edison Research of Somerville, N.J., and involved interviews with 2,207 randomly chosen undergraduates at 40 randomly selected four-year schools with at least 1,000 undergrads. To protect privacy, the schools were not being identified and students’ names were not recorded. The survey had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
The sponsorship by mtvU, an MTV channel for college students, is related to its “Half of Us” program, which it runs with the Jed Foundation for publicizing students’ mental health issues.
AP Polling Director Trevor Tompson, Deputy Polling Director Jennifer Agiesta and News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report.
Online:
AP polls: http://surveys.ap.org
A service of YellowBrix, Inc.
CREDIT: http://www.fastweb.com/student-life/articles/2749-ap-mtvu-poll-college-students-obamamania-wanes?g=1&page=2&utm_content=fw_c1_20101019_&utm_source=nlet
Monday, October 11, 2010
College Dropouts Cost Taxpayers Billions: Report
Dropping out of college after a year can mean lost time, burdensome debt and an uncertain future for students. Now there's an estimate of what it costs taxpayers. And it runs in the billions.
States appropriated almost $6.2 billion for four-year colleges and universities between 2003 and 2008 to help pay for the education of students who did not return for year two, a report released Monday says.
In addition, the federal government spent $1.5 billion and states spent $1.4 billion on grants for students who didn't start their sophomore years, according to "Finishing the First Lap: The Cost of First-Year Student Attrition in America's Four-Year Colleges and Universities."
The dollar figures, based on government data and gathered by the nonprofit American Institutes for Research, are meant to put an economic exclamation point on the argument that college completion rates need improvement.
But the findings also could give ammunition to critics who say too many students are attending four-year schools — and that pushing them to finish wastes even more taxpayer money.
The Obama administration, private foundations and others are driving a shift from focusing mostly on making college more accessible to getting more students through with a diploma or certificate.
Mark Schneider, a vice president at the American Institutes for Research and former commissioner of the Education Department's National Center for Education Statistics, said the report's goal is to spotlight the costs of losing students after year one, the most common exit door in college.
"We're all about college completion right now, and I agree 100 percent with the college completion agenda and we need a better-educated adult population and workforce," Schneider said.
The cost of educating students who drop out after one year account for between 2 to 8 percent of states' total higher education appropriations, Schneider said. He said the report emphasizes state spending because states provide most higher education money and hold the most regulatory sway over institutions and can drive change.
Ohio, for example, has moved toward using course and degree completion rates in determining how much money goes to its public colleges and universities instead of solely using enrollment figures.
"We recognize an institution is not going to be perfect on graduation and completion rates," said Eric Fingerhut, chancellor of the Ohio Board of Regents. "But at the same time, we know they can do better than they're doing. And if you place the financial rewards around completion, then you will motivate that."
The AIR report draws from Department of Education data, which Schneider concedes does not provide a full picture.
The figures track whether new full-time students at 1,521 public and private colleges and universities return for year two at the same institution. It doesn't include part-timers, transfers or students who come back later and graduate.
The actual cost to taxpayers may run two to three times higher given those factors and others, including the societal cost of income lost during dropouts' year in college, said Richard Vedder, an Ohio University economics professor.
And tying state appropriations to student performance could just cause colleges to lower their standards, he said.
Robert Lerman, an American University economics professor who, like Vedder, questions promoting college for all, said the report fleshes out the reality of high dropout rates.
But he said it could just as easily be used to argue that less-prepared, less-motivated students are better off not going to college.
"Getting them to go a second year might waste even more money," Lerman said. "Who knows?"
.
© 2010 CNBC.comWednesday, September 29, 2010
99ers Legislation Blocked In Senate for Tier 5 Emergency Unemployment Compensation!
Legislation by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) to help the "99ers" -- unemployed people who've exhausted the 99 weeks of unemployment insurance available in some states -- failed in the Senate on Wednesday, to nobody's surprise.
Sen. George LeMieux (R-Fla.) objected to Stabenow's unanimous consent request. "Without knowing how much it is going to cost and how we're going to pay for it, while we're all certainly sympathetic and want to work to make people go back to work -- my home state of Florida certainly suffering with very high unemployment -- we need to know how we're going to pay for it so we don't put this debt on our children and grandchildren," said LeMieux.
Stabenow's bill would have provided an additional 20 weeks of benefits in state where the unemployment rate is above 7.5 percent, and it would have boosted a tax credit for businesses that hire unemployed workers. Stabenow said she wanted the bill to be designated "emergency spending" and exempt from "pay-as-you-go" rules, as is customarily the case with unemployment benefits.
"The reality for us in America is that we will never get out of debt with more than 15 million people out of work," said Stabenow. "So when folks talk about the deficit and leaving the deficit for our children, we will never get out of debt had this country until people get back to work, until they have good-paying jobs, and in between times, we will not move this economy forward until we are helping people be able to keep going in this recession."
Despite the lobbying of the unemployed, additional weeks of benefits seemed like a hopeless cause after the Senate spent 50 days this summer in gridlock over a reauthorization of the existing 99 weeks.
Several unemployed people have told HuffPost over the past few weeks, however, that they appreciated the gesture even if the bill had no chance of success. Stabenow's spokesman ignored repeated requests for info from HuffPost.
To fight recessions Congress has routinely enacted extensions of unemployment benefits, but the 99 weeks currently available in some states is an unprecedented amount. The previous high was 55 weeks during the recession of the early 1980s. The current extensions will be up for reauthorization again in November.
"It seems to be business as usual in the Senate, with yet another attempt to help the long term unemployed blocked by someone who just doesn't understand how truly awful it is for job seekers," said Judy Conti, a lobbyist for the National Employment Law Project. "It's a sad day."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/29/tier-5-legislation-for-99_n_744215.html
Sen. George LeMieux (R-Fla.) objected to Stabenow's unanimous consent request. "Without knowing how much it is going to cost and how we're going to pay for it, while we're all certainly sympathetic and want to work to make people go back to work -- my home state of Florida certainly suffering with very high unemployment -- we need to know how we're going to pay for it so we don't put this debt on our children and grandchildren," said LeMieux.
Stabenow's bill would have provided an additional 20 weeks of benefits in state where the unemployment rate is above 7.5 percent, and it would have boosted a tax credit for businesses that hire unemployed workers. Stabenow said she wanted the bill to be designated "emergency spending" and exempt from "pay-as-you-go" rules, as is customarily the case with unemployment benefits.
"The reality for us in America is that we will never get out of debt with more than 15 million people out of work," said Stabenow. "So when folks talk about the deficit and leaving the deficit for our children, we will never get out of debt had this country until people get back to work, until they have good-paying jobs, and in between times, we will not move this economy forward until we are helping people be able to keep going in this recession."
Despite the lobbying of the unemployed, additional weeks of benefits seemed like a hopeless cause after the Senate spent 50 days this summer in gridlock over a reauthorization of the existing 99 weeks.
Several unemployed people have told HuffPost over the past few weeks, however, that they appreciated the gesture even if the bill had no chance of success. Stabenow's spokesman ignored repeated requests for info from HuffPost.
To fight recessions Congress has routinely enacted extensions of unemployment benefits, but the 99 weeks currently available in some states is an unprecedented amount. The previous high was 55 weeks during the recession of the early 1980s. The current extensions will be up for reauthorization again in November.
"It seems to be business as usual in the Senate, with yet another attempt to help the long term unemployed blocked by someone who just doesn't understand how truly awful it is for job seekers," said Judy Conti, a lobbyist for the National Employment Law Project. "It's a sad day."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/29/tier-5-legislation-for-99_n_744215.html
Friday, September 24, 2010
NBC NEWS - Education Nation
Education Nation is a nationally broadcast, in-depth conversation about improving education in America.
During an interactive summit on Rockefeller Plaza, parents, teachers, and students will come together with leaders in politics, business, and technology to discuss the challenges and opportunities in education today. In addition, NBC News will turn Rockefeller Plaza into a “Learning Plaza," a series of five galleries, open to the public, which will allow visitors to explore America's educational "ecosystem." During the entire week of September 26th, NBC News will highlight education stories as well as broadcast live from the Plaza.
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE EVENT WILL INCLUDE:
- SUMMIT WITH TOP LEADERS IN EDUCATION: U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Harlem Children Zone’s CEO Geoffrey Canada, and President of MIT Susan Hockfield will be among those in attendance at the Education Nation Summit.
- SPECIAL APPEARANCES: The Summit will feature several presentations from guests, including a speech on improving the lives of children from U.S. General Colin Powell, Founding Chairman of America’s Promise Alliance, and Alma Powell, Chair of America’s Promise Alliance.
- MULTI-MEDIA COVERAGE: During the entire week of Education Nation, "Nightly News," "Today," "Meet the Press," MSNBC, CNBC, Telemundo, msnbc.com, iVillage.com, and EducationNation.com will highlight stories in education.
- TEACHER TOWN HALL: On Sept. 26th, NBC's Brian Williams will talk with thousands of teachers on-air and online about critical issues facing educators.
- THE STUDENT VIEW: The Scholastic Kids Press Corp will cover the Summit from the student perspective.
- INTERACTIVE EXHIBITS: The latest tools and technologies used in award-winning classrooms across the country will be on display in Learning Plaza.
Education Nation seeks to engage the public, through thoughtful dialogue, in pursuit of the shared goal of providing every American with an opportunity to pursue the best education in the world. More
CREDIT FOR ARTICLE: NBC NEWS - Education Nation : http://www.educationnation.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







First Posted: 09-29-10 04:55 PM | Updated: 09-29-10 04:59 PM